Where we simulate the life of pro athletes!
Teams are ranked by the following methods in order, with the next method used only for tiebreakers for teams still tied from preceding methods.
| Rank | Team | GP | W | L | T | Pct | Pts-F | Pts-A | +/- | Avg Pts-F | Avg Pts-A | Avg +/- | W/L Streak | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Notre Dame | Games Played | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 109 | 58 | 51 | 27.2 | 14.5 | 12.8 | W-4 |
| 2 | Florida | Games Played | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.750 | 115 | 64 | 51 | 28.8 | 16.0 | 12.8 | W-1 |
| 3 | LSU | Games Played | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.750 | 98 | 78 | 20 | 24.5 | 19.5 | 5.0 | W-2 |
| 4 | Alabama | Games Played | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.750 | 92 | 86 | 6 | 23.0 | 21.5 | 1.5 | W-3 |
| 5 | Oklahoma | Games Played | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.250 | 66 | 92 | -26 | 16.5 | 23.0 | -6.5 | L-3 |
| 6 | Georgia | Games Played | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.250 | 64 | 76 | -12 | 16.0 | 19.0 | -3.0 | L-2 |
| 7 | Texas | Games Played | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0.250 | 64 | 109 | -45 | 16.0 | 27.2 | -11.2 | L-1 |
| 8 | Michigan | Games Played | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.000 | 74 | 119 | -45 | 18.5 | 29.8 | -11.2 | L-4 |